Thursday, 18 June 2020
Hypocrisy 'at the heart' of the Black Lives Matter movement
Wednesday, 17 June 2020
Man fined £450 for 'provocative' fart in front of police officers
Tuesday, 16 June 2020
Saturday, 13 June 2020
Funny animal memes monthly contest.
We have a winner. It's Pony. Not a big surprise really? Winning big with Great Idea? Pony you are now the newest reigning..... defending..... undisputed..... King of memes. May you My Little Pony over the competition forever!!
Tuesday, 9 June 2020
McEnany: Trump 'appalled' by defund police efforts
Friday, 5 June 2020
Friday Share Night!
Wednesday, 3 June 2020
We all know a ‘Karen’ or two. But who, exactly, is a Karen?
For those
who don’t know here’s an article by The Daily News:
First, there was the ‘can I speak to the manager’ Karen.
Then came the blonde bob Karen.
Followed by racist Karen, soccer mum Karen, toilet paper
hoarding Karen, and anti-vax Karen.
Now, there is the Central Park Karen.
New York woman Amy Cooper lost her job after getting into an
argument with African-American man Christian Cooper, no relation, in Central
Park after he asked her to leash her dog – in a leash area.
“I’m taking a picture and calling the cops,” Amy Cooper is heard
saying in the video. “I’m going to tell them there’s an African-American man
threatening my life.”
Amy has apologized but the damage is done. She has become a
Karen.
The video went viral, launching a new wave of memes and heated
debate over if the Karen meme is ‘problematic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfVU87y1B60
Karen is everywhere.
But who actually is she?
Karen is a concept.
Like most things that start on the world wide web, the exact
origin is hard to pin down, but it’s believed it first appeared in 2014.
It has been linked to the film Mean Girls where one of the main
characters says to another: “Oh my God, Karen, you can’t just ask someone why
they’re white.”
Then, in 2017, an anonymous Reddit user with the screen name
f***_you_Karen went viral on the platform after posting rants about ex-wife
Karen, who he said had taken his children and their house during the divorce
proceedings.
It spawned the subreddit r/f***youkaren in 2017 where people
could share stories and memes about run-ins with entitled middle-aged white
women.
The Urban
Dictionary definition of Karen appeared in March 2018
and the meme was inducted into the slang hall of fame.
Since then, Karen has saturated the internet.
“Karen is a caricature of the problematic aspects of whiteness
and privilege,” the University of Melbourne’s Dr Lauren Rosewarne, who
specialises in gender, sexuality and pop culture said.
“It’s manifested in middle age white women. We would have used
to use the word ‘basic’ to describe her aesthetically,” Dr Rosewarne said.
“But the key parts are, she’s white, she’s middle-aged, and
generally she’s blonde, not always, but in memes she is.
“She’s seen as someone who is oblivious to how they treat
others.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBspygDA8Vo&feature=emb_title
Proponents of the Karen meme argue that it’s a way to use humour
to subvert the entitlement of middle-class women who treat people of colour and
people in service roles like they own them.
“It’s a class thing, but it’s an obliviousness thing. Or another
way to look at it is, there’s an entitlement there,” she said.
“If you think about the memes, you think about Karen wanting to
see the manager or wanting to call the police on black people driving or
jogging. There’s a set of things this woman feels entitled to.”
Karen is straight, drives an SUV in the city, refuses to
vaccinate her children, lives in the suburbs, drinks too much wine, posts trite
motivational messages on Facebook and calls the police on black people who are
just going about their lives.
Karen can be contradictory. She passively-aggressively enforces
COVID-19 guarantee restrictions and at the same time protested strict lockdown
measures because she couldn’t get to the hairdressers.
Mostly, she’s as entitled as she is ignorant and lives her life
without consequences.
Karen doesn’t die.
The joke manifests in different ways, and the memes often respond
to global and viral events, so it has had a long internet shelf life.
“Every time we think it’s done they’ll be scandal like the one
in New York and it gets new life because she’s the new iteration of Karen,” Dr
Rosewarne said.
“It has millage and high-level saturation.”
But is Karen sexist?
As the meme took off and become more prominent online the
message behind it got confused and, what was once a way of laughing at the
racial controversies white women caused, became a controversy in its own right.
The criticism is that Karen is sexist. That we make fun of only
women for being demanding, that there is no male equivalent.
‘Why is it OK to make fun of entitled white women when they ‘ask
to speak to the manager’ but never a man?’ is the general line of questioning.
Real-life Karen’s have arched up. With one recently writing to
the editor of the Los
Angeles Times to say she was ‘grief-stricken’ that the paper
had run an opinion piece condoning the use of Karen, or as she put it,
approving ‘of dragging my name through the mud’.
But the debate fired up in April after radical British feminist
Julie Bindel tweeted that “the ‘Karen’ slur is woman-hating and based on class
prejudice”, arguing that it was a working-class name.
Enter the furore of the internet.
Almost no one in Australia has heard of Ms Bindel, but the tweet
made Karen very busy, as she bounced around opinion articles, twitter threads,
and Facebook arguments.
On one side we had a thousand Karens scorned, and their allies
who wanted us to see the meme as sexist.
On the other, we had many people of colour and less-radical
feminists who were frustrated that the term’s original use, to direct racism in
a humorous way, was being thrown out the window by ‘whiney white women’.
Oh, Karen, what have you done?
Like most things, Karen is complex, said Dr Rosewarne.
“It’s tricky. The meme is not an indictment of women primarily,
it’s an indictment of whiteness, but in doing that there is a gendered message.
“There was a chat on social media yesterday about what the male
equivalent is.
“People were proposing things like Chad, but Chad isn’t the
equivalent.
“Much like sl-t and stud, we don’t have a male equivalent, and
that means there is something gendered about it, even though the memes are
primarily about whiteness.
“Lots of things that are meant to be one thing, have other
underlying aspects.”
Kayleigh McEnany Holds White House Press Briefing
Tuesday, 2 June 2020
Saturday, 30 May 2020
dERpy Doxing Detente -- What exactly is doxing?
Disruption from posting music videos, animal memes, or .gifs designed to cause epilepsy will not be allowed in this thread.

***
dERp has recently complained bitterly about being doxed. I'm really confused about much of this. There is a pattern of dERp claiming she has been doxed when people do to her things that she has done to others. dERp denies that what appears to be the same activity is doxing when she does it. The only consistency I can see in whether or not any particular action is doxing-according-to-dERp is whether or not dERp likes the person she claims is being doxed.
***
For example, dERp last week raised holy heck about Wish posting an image of her father. I don't condone Wish's action, and in fact would rather he had not done it. Still, I can see where Wish felt he had license to post this picture. On dERp's dERpy Fluxus blog, at this moment, where dERp is the sole moderator, there is an image of another disqus commenter that dERp herself posted. Before and after the image of this commenter contain a lot of dERpy vitriol.
***
Just to clarify the dERpy doxing standard, I'd like to ask a few questions. dERp, please help me to understand what is, in your opinion, acceptable and what is not.
***
1.) Is it OK for you to post an image of, or related to the real life of, a disqus commenter with whom you is having a disagreement?
2.) Is it OK for someone to post a real life image of, or related to, you during a disagreement?

***
dERp really enjoys making claims about how she is being doxed when one posts just her unusual first name. She claims that if one knows approximately where she lives one can determine her IRL identity. The disqus TOS specifically PERMIT posting a commenter's name. I don't condone posting a commenter's name personally and would prefer to never see a commenter's name on on disqus. The dERpy dissonance arises here because dERp has posted the last name of another disqus commenter. This commenter's geographical location is known on disqus. The last name is relatively uncommon in that locality, and given that dERp also provided a very slight variation of that commenter's first name in the same post, it appears she has structurally done the same thing to this person that she complains about being done to her.
***
3.) Is it OK for you to complain that you are being doxed by posting your first name when the disqus TOS, which prohibits doxing, specifically does not disallow posting full names?
4.) Does a moral conflict occur when you complain about your first name being posted if you also posts the last name of a commenter, especially considering that this commenter lives in an area where the name is uncommon, and that dERp uses a very slight variation of the commenter's first name in the same post?

***
Recently dERp posted a redacted image of her own father. My feeling is that she did this to secure her much sought after special-victim-status. It was quickly learned that dERp had posted enough information to dox her own dad.
***
Regarding that same image, dERp had made a claim about Wish posting her father's "unllisted" phone number. The image Wish posted (Once again, I do not condone the posting of that image.) contained a phone number that was included in the public webpage by dERp's father.
***
5.) Did your desire to be seen as a victim result in the accidental doxing of your own father?
6.) Is it legitimate to claim that Wish posted your Dad's "unlisted" number, when Dad himself listed the number by publishing it on a public website?

***
dERp recently claimed that I had doxed her by revealing that the taxpayers of her state paid her salary. In my defense, earlier, I had stated that this number included 50,000 people, thus it was not PII. I've done a bit more reading on the topic, and I now understand that there are over 200,000 tax-payer funded jobs in her state. dERp insisted that I had doxed her by putting her in the category of having a job where her wages are paid by taxes collected by the citizens of that state.
***
This can be contrasted with recent postings on dERp's Fluxus blog, where she was the sole moderator. At present, there are at least two doxing socks which have links back to my real life as part of their profiles. dERp reached out to one of these socks, inviting it to post at her blog. In the invitation she reposted the link back to my real life. This post remained up for over two weeks in spite of my directly pointing the problem out to her 16 times. The first 13 times she didn't even acknowledge the problem. Another commenter on her blog also pointed out the doxing sock directly to dERp prior an mention of it by me. Also, I've subsequently learned that the post where dERp doxed me was flagged a minimum of seven times before it was taken down.
***
In the past dERp had made specific references to being a member of a much smaller subset of that 200,000 + group I mentioned, the subset having around 3,000 members. dERp claims my mentioning her being a part of a group of 200,000 people was doxing. The link she reposted from the doxing sock she invited to post at Fluxus went to a group of fewer than 30 people and this group included children as young as 11.
***
7.) Did I dox you by mentioning that you were one among 200,000+?
8.) If yes to #7, did your previous disclosure that you were part of a subset of that 200,000+ that subset consisting of around 3,000 people negate any doxing that might have occurred?
9.) If yes to #7, did you dox me by linking to a website for a group of only about 30 people which is tied to me IRL?

***
dERp's original ID was used to post revenge porn of a popular disqus commenter. Recently, when confronted with this fact, dERp posted the name of the person who was the victim of this revenge porn, and further went on to describe a specific sex act. dERp often describes herself as a feminist.
***
10.) Was it doxing for you to name the victim of revenge porn?
11.) Is your revealing the name of the victim and describing specific sex acts consistent with being a feminist?

***
dERp has over the years obtained PII from people by luring them to her blog. She has bragged and gloated about having possession of this information. dERp has told three different stories about how she shared this information with JOS. Regardlss of which is true, JOS came into possession of the information through dERp. JOS, who at this point had a well established reputation for doxing people by posting their Emails including Email addresses publicly, posted mine. He also posted IP information obtained from dERp for myself and another disqus commenter. There could have been no doubt that JOS would publish the information. The disqus TOS in force at the time of the collection and at the time of the doxing specifically forbade the publishing of IP and Email addresses.
***
12.) Did you dox disqus commenters by sharing email addresses obtained from your blog with JOS?
13.) Did you dox disqus commenters by sharing their IP addresses with JOS?

***
At times dERp has claimed that posting a person's name on disqus is NOT doxing.
***
14.) If this is true, how can you make the claim that posting only your FIRST name is doxing?

***
dERp, I know your education was critically substandard, and you'll need help with some concepts. I want for you to think of detente as meaning, "If you don't have it, we don't have it." Please answer the questions above and further expand on what is and what is not doxing. Your readers simply cannot tell what you do and do not consider doxing based on what you have written to date.

Friday, 29 May 2020
You Can Kick People's Balls But You can't Touch Them.
to do with someone else's balls,when you should get your own balls out and whose balls
you can kick.
Laura Curran,a New York county executive,gave the advice earlier this month ahead
of the opening of tennis courts. However,she was left a little red-faced after realising
what she was saying was full of innuendo.
She said:Every player,unless they're from the same household,has to bring their own
tennis balls so you don't touch other people's tennis balls with your hands. You can kick their balls but you can't touch them.
She then paused before continuing: 'I'm going to blush,sorry. Of course if you're playing with someone in your household you can touch those tennis balls.
'To avoid confusion between whose balls are whose you can use a marker like a Sharpie
to mark out an x or put someone's initials on them.
Her colleagues found it equally amusing and could be heard tittering in the background
as she delivered her press conference in Eisenhower Park,Nassau County.
Politics American Presidents
We need a new thread and as politics seems to be a very popular subject , who is your favourite president of all time? As politics can be de...
-
The weather in London this weekend is going to be Sunny and 90F. This is very unusual for us and even though shops have air conditioning w...
-
A Buffalo named Donald Trump for it's blond tuft has been spared from Eid al-Adha sacrifice after a last minute government intervention....
















